TY - JOUR
T1 - Red Listing lichenized fungi
T2 - best practices and future prospects
AU - Yahr, Rebecca
AU - Allen, Jessica L.
AU - Atienza, Violeta
AU - Burgartz, Frank
AU - Chrismas, Nathan
AU - Dal Forno, Manuela
AU - Degtjarenko, Polina
AU - Ohmura, Yoshihito
AU - Pérez-Ortega, Sergio
AU - Randlane, Tiina
AU - Næsborg, Rikke Reese
AU - Simijaca-Salcedo, Diego
AU - von Hirschheydt, Gesa
AU - Anderson, Frances
AU - Aptroot, Andre
AU - Balderas, Eli
AU - Borukhiyah, Niles
AU - Chandler, Amanda M.
AU - Marro, Maria Chesa
AU - Divakar, Pradeep K.
AU - García, Renato Andrés
AU - de los Ángeles Herrera-Campos, Maria
AU - Howe, Natalie
AU - Joseph, Siljo
AU - Larsen, Elaine M.
AU - Lendemer, James C.
AU - McMullin, R. Troy
AU - Michlig, Andrea
AU - Moncada, Bibiana
AU - Paulsen, Julianna
AU - Roa-García, Francibelk
AU - Rosentreter, Roger
AU - Scheidegger, Christoph
AU - Sparrius, Laurens B.
AU - Stone, Daphne Fisher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Lichen Society.
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - According to International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) guidelines, all species must be assessed against all criteria during the Red Listing process. For organismal groups that are diverse and understudied, assessors face considerable challenges in assembling evidence due to difficulty in applying definitions of key terms used in the guidelines. Challenges also arise because of uncertainty in population sizes (Criteria A, C, D) and distributions (Criteria A2/3/4c, B). Lichens, which are often small, difficult to identify, or overlooked during biodiversity inventories, are one such group for which specific difficulties arise in applying Red List criteria. Here, we offer approaches and examples that address challenges in completing Red List assessments for lichens in a rapidly changing arena of data availability and analysis strategies. While assessors still contend with far from perfect information about individual species, we propose practical solutions for completing robust assessments given the currently available knowledge of individual lichen life-histories.
AB - According to International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) guidelines, all species must be assessed against all criteria during the Red Listing process. For organismal groups that are diverse and understudied, assessors face considerable challenges in assembling evidence due to difficulty in applying definitions of key terms used in the guidelines. Challenges also arise because of uncertainty in population sizes (Criteria A, C, D) and distributions (Criteria A2/3/4c, B). Lichens, which are often small, difficult to identify, or overlooked during biodiversity inventories, are one such group for which specific difficulties arise in applying Red List criteria. Here, we offer approaches and examples that address challenges in completing Red List assessments for lichens in a rapidly changing arena of data availability and analysis strategies. While assessors still contend with far from perfect information about individual species, we propose practical solutions for completing robust assessments given the currently available knowledge of individual lichen life-histories.
KW - IUCN
KW - conservation assessment
KW - extinction risk
KW - generation time
KW - lifespan
KW - mature individuals
KW - red list
KW - uncertain distribution
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214365529
U2 - 10.1017/S0024282924000355
DO - 10.1017/S0024282924000355
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85214365529
SN - 0024-2829
VL - 56
SP - 345
EP - 362
JO - Lichenologist
JF - Lichenologist
IS - 6
ER -