Revised onset age of magnetochron Mor: Chronostratigraphic and geologic implications

Youjuan Li, Huafeng Qin, Brian R. Jicha, Magdalena H. Huyskens, Corey J. Wall, Robin B. Trayler, Qing Zhu Yin, Mark Schmitz, Yongxin Pan, Chenglong Deng, Brad S. Singer, Huaiyu He, Rixiang Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

The timing of the onset of magnetochron Mor and its duration are disputed, reflecting both a limited set of radioisotopic dates and uncertain magnetostratigraphic correlations. We present a chronostratigraphic framework for a reversed polarity interval based on two chronometers (40Ar/39Ar, U-Pb) and newly published paleomagnetic data from the Qingshan Group, Jiaolai Basin, China. Bayesian modeling of U-Pb zircon and 40Ar/39Ar sanidine dates suggests a minimum duration of 540 ± 37 k.y. (95% credible interval) for the reversed polarity interval. These findings are compatible with an astrochronologic age model for M-sequence seafloor magnetic anomalies, indicating that the reversely magnetized sediments correspond to magnetochron Mor rather than the shorter chron "M-1r." Integration of U-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar ages constrains the onset of Mor to 120.29 ± 0.09 Ma, which is ~1 m.y. younger than that inferred in the current geologic time scale (GTS 2020). This finding also implies that the Cretaceous normal superchron (CNS) began at 119.70 ± 0.12 Ma and that the average seafloor spreading rate during the CNS was ~3.5% higher than that inferred from GTS 2020. It also suggests that oceanic anoxic event 1a began at 119.40 ± 0.12 Ma, thereby providing an updated chronologic basis for exploring the primary trigger of this carbon cycle perturbation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)565-570
Number of pages6
JournalGeology
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revised onset age of magnetochron Mor: Chronostratigraphic and geologic implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this