Searching for Green Elephants and Other Mythical Creatures During the Trump Years: Partisanship and Congressional Voting on Environmental Legislation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Are there any environmentalists left in the Republican Party? Using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and data from the League of Conservation Voters (LCV) for the 115th (2017–2018) and 116th (2019–2020) Congresses, the author finds that around 25% of Republicans in the House of Representatives and 40% of those in the Senate are more supportive of environmental legislation than the average Democrat in their respective chambers, when separating partisanship from environmentalism. However, findings also suggest that environmentalism for Republicans tends to focus far more on conserving existing programs and resources than it does on advocating for progressive new policies to address emerging problems, like climate change, so it manifests differently than environmentally focused initiatives that are synonymous with the policy doctrine of Democrats.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalPolitics & Policy
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2022

Keywords

  • Congress
  • Senate
  • Trump administration
  • climate change
  • congressional voting
  • environmental legislation

EGS Disciplines

  • Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Searching for Green Elephants and Other Mythical Creatures During the Trump Years: Partisanship and Congressional Voting on Environmental Legislation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this