So How Was Your Conference? Panel Chairs' Perceptions of the 2003 ACJS Meeting in Boston

David Mueller, Andrew Giacomazzi, James Wada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Questionnaire data from 137 panel chairs at the 2003 Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences meeting in Boston reveal respondent perceptions of the conference site, overall impressions of the conference, as well as panelist attendance, and the quality of information presented by panelists. The findings reveal high marks for the conference space, hotel rooms, and the city of Boston itself, resulting in an overall positive conference experience, but responses also highlight several areas of concern, including panelist attendance problems and presentation etiquette. Recommendations are provided, which may foster positive, incremental change at future ACJS annual meetings.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)201-218
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice Education
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2004

EGS Disciplines

  • Criminal Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'So How Was Your Conference? Panel Chairs' Perceptions of the 2003 ACJS Meeting in Boston'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this