Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Study protocol for coaching and leadership in autism support settings: A cluster randomized controlled hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial

  • Jill Locke
  • , Nathaniel J. Williams
  • , Aksheya Sridhar
  • , Wendy Shih
  • , Christine Espeland
  • , Daina Tagavi
  • , Karen Bearss
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of Washington
  • Catalight

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background
The increased prevalence of autism spectrum disorder creates a sense of urgency to improve outcomes for this population in publicly funded education systems, the primary setting in which autistic children receive behavioral health services in the United States. Important barriers to progress include a lack of feasible clinical interventions that address autistic children’s externalizing behaviors in schools and major challenges sustaining fidelity to newly implemented programs over time. This trial addresses these gaps by (1) testing the clinical effectiveness of the Research Units on Behavioral Interventions in Educational Settings (RUBIES) program relative to educator psychoeducation on externalizing behaviors of autistic children in public elementary schools, and (2) testing the effects of adding a leadership-focused organizational implementation strategy, Helping Educational Leaders Mobilize Evidence (HELM), to educator coaching in RUBIES on RUBIES sustainment.

Methods
In a cluster-randomized, hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial, schools will be randomized to one of 3 arms: 1) educator coaching in RUBIES and school participation in HELM; 2) educator coaching in RUBIES only; or 3) a control condition incorporating an active clinical comparator, educator psychoeducation. We will enroll 42 schools and 126 educators yoked to 126 elementary-aged autistic children. Depending on arm, educators will complete study instruments up to six times: 1) Spring semester prior to the year of school and student enrollment (implementation baseline; arms 1–2); 2) Fall semester Year 1 (clinical baseline; arms 1–3); 3) 16 weeks (arms 1–3); 4) 24 weeks (arms 1–3); 5) 52 weeks (arms 1–2); and 6) 76 weeks (arms 1–2). The primary clinical outcome compares arms 1 & 2 vs. 3 on change in autistic children’s externalizing behavior from clinical baseline to 24 weeks. The primary implementation outcome compares arms 1 vs. 2 on RUBIES sustainment, operationalized as educators’ average RUBIES fidelity at 52 and 76 weeks.

Discussion
Generating evidence for the clinical effectiveness of RUBIES addresses a significant gap in educator-delivered interventions to minimize highly prevalent externalizing behaviors among autistic children in public schools. Simultaneously, testing the effectiveness of HELM on sustainment of RUBIES will inform future efforts to successfully implement and sustain new innovations for autistic youth in public schools.
Original languageEnglish
JournalImplementation Science
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 May 2026

Keywords

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder/therapy
  • Autistic Disorder/therapy
  • Child
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Implementation Science
  • Leadership
  • Mentoring/methods
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • School Health Services/organization & administration
  • Schools/organization & administration
  • United States

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Study protocol for coaching and leadership in autism support settings: A cluster randomized controlled hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this