TY - JOUR
T1 - Successful academic-public health practice collaboration
T2 - WhatWorks from the public health workforce's perspective
AU - McCullough, J. Mac
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Context: Public health departments and academic institutions engage in a range of cooperative activities that can greatly benefit a public health department and can often be mutually beneficial. Yet, little is known regarding practitioners' views of successful academic collaborations. Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore predictors and correlates of beneficial academic collaboration from the perspective of those on the front lines\-The practitioners constituting the public health workforce. Design: Analysis of the Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS), a cross-sectional survey of state health department practitioners, conducted in 2014. Participants: PH WINS is a nationally representative survey of state health department practitioners. Data were available for a total of 8718 respondents in 37 states. Main Outcome Measures: Two main outcome measures were used\-(a) whether a respondent reported collaborating with an academic entity (including faculty/staff/students) in the past year, and (b) when collaboration did occur, the success of the collaboration insofar as the respondent perceived the engagement as very helpful. Results: Health department practitioners (27.2%) reported participating in an academic-practice collaboration. Factors associated with partnering included respondents' supervisory status, positional duties, and public health background. Of these respondents, 46.6% reported a successful collaboration. Factors associated with a successful collaboration included respondents' self-reported job skills and public health background. Conclusion: While characteristics related to a public health practitioner's position are most significant in predicting whether a collaboration will occur, characteristics of the individual him- or herself are more relevant in predicting whether a collaboration will be successful. Public health managers interested in fostering an environment that promotes a successful academic-practice collaboration may benefit from ensuring that the public health practitioners involved in such collaborations are themselves trained in public health.
AB - Context: Public health departments and academic institutions engage in a range of cooperative activities that can greatly benefit a public health department and can often be mutually beneficial. Yet, little is known regarding practitioners' views of successful academic collaborations. Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore predictors and correlates of beneficial academic collaboration from the perspective of those on the front lines\-The practitioners constituting the public health workforce. Design: Analysis of the Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS), a cross-sectional survey of state health department practitioners, conducted in 2014. Participants: PH WINS is a nationally representative survey of state health department practitioners. Data were available for a total of 8718 respondents in 37 states. Main Outcome Measures: Two main outcome measures were used\-(a) whether a respondent reported collaborating with an academic entity (including faculty/staff/students) in the past year, and (b) when collaboration did occur, the success of the collaboration insofar as the respondent perceived the engagement as very helpful. Results: Health department practitioners (27.2%) reported participating in an academic-practice collaboration. Factors associated with partnering included respondents' supervisory status, positional duties, and public health background. Of these respondents, 46.6% reported a successful collaboration. Factors associated with a successful collaboration included respondents' self-reported job skills and public health background. Conclusion: While characteristics related to a public health practitioner's position are most significant in predicting whether a collaboration will occur, characteristics of the individual him- or herself are more relevant in predicting whether a collaboration will be successful. Public health managers interested in fostering an environment that promotes a successful academic-practice collaboration may benefit from ensuring that the public health practitioners involved in such collaborations are themselves trained in public health.
KW - Academic partnerships
KW - Academic-public health practice collaboration
KW - Public health workforce
KW - State health department
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943193166&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000297
DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000297
M3 - Article
C2 - 26422481
AN - SCOPUS:84943193166
SN - 1078-4659
VL - 21
SP - S121-S129
JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
ER -