TY - JOUR
T1 - "That's Why I Call It a Task Farce": Organizations and Participation in the Colorado Roadless Rule
AU - Smith, Hollie M.
AU - Norton, Todd
N1 - Power differentials among organizations and individuals have long been noted in traditional public participation processes, with particular shortfalls being noted in structure. In response to command-and-control tactics, scholars have called for a more innovative and collaborative form of participation.
PY - 2013/8/13
Y1 - 2013/8/13
N2 - Power differentials among organizations and individuals have long been noted in traditional public participation processes, with particular shortfalls being noted in structure. In response to command-and-control tactics, scholars have called for a more innovative and collaborative form of participation. In this manuscript we critically examine structure and discourse within environmental decision-making, focusing on one case that employed traditional and innovative forms of participation. Through our analysis we find that participation, even innovative, seemingly collaborative forms, is occupied by powerful and more organized groups. Our analysis highlights how certain organizations successfully manage power within these innovative forms of participation and the dialectical tensions among structure and discourse which constitute partisanship in policy processes seemingly designed to facilitate public interests. We also highlight the relationship between representatives, organizations, and interests within environmental decision-making.
AB - Power differentials among organizations and individuals have long been noted in traditional public participation processes, with particular shortfalls being noted in structure. In response to command-and-control tactics, scholars have called for a more innovative and collaborative form of participation. In this manuscript we critically examine structure and discourse within environmental decision-making, focusing on one case that employed traditional and innovative forms of participation. Through our analysis we find that participation, even innovative, seemingly collaborative forms, is occupied by powerful and more organized groups. Our analysis highlights how certain organizations successfully manage power within these innovative forms of participation and the dialectical tensions among structure and discourse which constitute partisanship in policy processes seemingly designed to facilitate public interests. We also highlight the relationship between representatives, organizations, and interests within environmental decision-making.
KW - collaboration
KW - environmental decision-making
KW - power
KW - public participation
KW - roadless
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.813563
U2 - 10.1080/17524032.2013.813563
DO - 10.1080/17524032.2013.813563
M3 - Article
VL - 7
JO - Environmental Communication
JF - Environmental Communication
IS - 4
ER -