TY - JOUR
T1 - The Cambrian of the Grand Canyon
T2 - Refinement of a Classic Stratigraphic Model
AU - Dehler, Carol
AU - Sundberg, Frederick
AU - Karlstrom, Karl
AU - Crossey, Laura
AU - Schmitz, Mark
AU - Rowland, Stephen
AU - Hagadorn, James
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - The Cambrian Tonto Group of the Grand Canyon was used by Edwin McKee in 1945 to make an insightful visual representation of how sedimentary facies record transgression across a craton—a common conceptual framework still used in geologic education. Although the tenets of McKee’s facies diagram persist, the integration of new stratigraphy, depositional models, paleontology, biostratigraphy, and other data is refining the underlying dynamics of this cratonic transgression. Instead of McKee’s interpretation of one major transgression with only minor regressions, there are at least five stratigraphic sequences, of which the lower three are separated by disconformities. These hiatal surfaces likely represent erosion of previously deposited Cambrian sediments that were laid down on the tropical, pre-vegetated landscape. Rather than being fully marine in origin, these sequences were formed by a mosaic of depositional environments including braided coastal plain, eolian, marginal marine, and various shallow marine environments. McKee, not having the insights of sequence stratigraphy and plate tectonics, concluded that the preservation of these sediments were due to predepositional topography and subsidence of the “geosyncline.” Our modern interpretation is that accommodation space was a result of eustasy and differential subsidence on the continental margin. Our modified depositional model provides a more effective teaching tool for fundamentals and nuances of modern stratigraphic thinking, using the Tonto Group as a still-influential type location for understanding transgressive successions.
AB - The Cambrian Tonto Group of the Grand Canyon was used by Edwin McKee in 1945 to make an insightful visual representation of how sedimentary facies record transgression across a craton—a common conceptual framework still used in geologic education. Although the tenets of McKee’s facies diagram persist, the integration of new stratigraphy, depositional models, paleontology, biostratigraphy, and other data is refining the underlying dynamics of this cratonic transgression. Instead of McKee’s interpretation of one major transgression with only minor regressions, there are at least five stratigraphic sequences, of which the lower three are separated by disconformities. These hiatal surfaces likely represent erosion of previously deposited Cambrian sediments that were laid down on the tropical, pre-vegetated landscape. Rather than being fully marine in origin, these sequences were formed by a mosaic of depositional environments including braided coastal plain, eolian, marginal marine, and various shallow marine environments. McKee, not having the insights of sequence stratigraphy and plate tectonics, concluded that the preservation of these sediments were due to predepositional topography and subsidence of the “geosyncline.” Our modern interpretation is that accommodation space was a result of eustasy and differential subsidence on the continental margin. Our modified depositional model provides a more effective teaching tool for fundamentals and nuances of modern stratigraphic thinking, using the Tonto Group as a still-influential type location for understanding transgressive successions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85212001093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1130/GSATG604A.1
DO - 10.1130/GSATG604A.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85212001093
SN - 1052-5173
VL - 34
SP - 4
EP - 11
JO - GSA Today
JF - GSA Today
IS - 11
ER -