TY - JOUR
T1 - The Fate of Imperiled Species
T2 - Lessons from 50 Years of the US Endangered Species Act
AU - Schwartz, Mark W.
AU - Williamson, Matthew A.
AU - Apodaca, Joseph J.
AU - Echeverri, Alejandra
AU - Guzman, Laura Melissa
AU - Kroetz, Kailin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 by the author(s).. This work is licensed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See credit lines of images or other third-party material in this article for license information.
PY - 2025/11/5
Y1 - 2025/11/5
N2 - Looking back on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) after 50-plus years of implementation reveals a substantial influence on conservation science. The ESA catalyzed science to support listing decisions, species status assessments, a shared understanding of species’ habitats and ranges, threat assessment and recovery planning. However, rising threats to species and limited resources to support recovery have resulted in increasing numbers of imperiled species. Prioritizing investment in biodiversity management requires more interdisciplinary approaches. Emerging research is shifting from objective solution seeking to supporting complex listing decisions based on increasingly complex genetic data to nontraditional management measures like assisted migration. Conservation science has evolved to focus on scales beyond a single species, leading to both new challenges and opportunities in how the ESA can support ecosystem and landscape-scale conservation. The importance of increasingly inclusive management also presents challenges and opportunities for more integrative research to support ESA decision-making.
AB - Looking back on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) after 50-plus years of implementation reveals a substantial influence on conservation science. The ESA catalyzed science to support listing decisions, species status assessments, a shared understanding of species’ habitats and ranges, threat assessment and recovery planning. However, rising threats to species and limited resources to support recovery have resulted in increasing numbers of imperiled species. Prioritizing investment in biodiversity management requires more interdisciplinary approaches. Emerging research is shifting from objective solution seeking to supporting complex listing decisions based on increasingly complex genetic data to nontraditional management measures like assisted migration. Conservation science has evolved to focus on scales beyond a single species, leading to both new challenges and opportunities in how the ESA can support ecosystem and landscape-scale conservation. The importance of increasingly inclusive management also presents challenges and opportunities for more integrative research to support ESA decision-making.
KW - biodiversity
KW - conservation science
KW - endangered species
KW - environmental law
KW - Indigenous Knowledge
KW - species recovery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020947596
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102723-064002
DO - 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102723-064002
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105020947596
SN - 1543-592X
VL - 56
SP - 217
EP - 240
JO - Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
JF - Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
IS - 1
ER -