TY - JOUR
T1 - The Icelandic Prevention Model Evaluation Framework and Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment
AU - Mann, Michael J.
AU - Allegrante, John P.
AU - Smith, Megan L.
AU - Sigfusdottir, Inga Dora
AU - Kristjansson, Alfgeir L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - The Icelandic Prevention Model (IPM) follows a systematic but flexible process of community capacity building, data collection, analysis, dissemination, and community-engaged decision-making to guide the data-informed selection, prioritization, and implementation of intervention strategies in preventing adolescent substance use. This paper describes two new evaluation tools intended to assess the: 1) integrity of IPM implementation, and 2) unique aspects of IPM implementation in different community contexts. These evaluation tools include a: 1) five-phase IPM Evaluation Framework for Assessing Value Across Communities, Cultures, and Outcomes (IPM-EF); and 2) 10-Step IPM Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment (IPM-IICA) that utilizes both quantitative (scored) and qualitative (narrative) data elements to characterize implementation integrity and consistency at both community coalition and school community levels. The IPM-EF includes five phases. Phase 1: Describe the Intervention Context; Phase 2a: Document the Extent to Which the 10 Steps of the IPM were Implemented (using the IPM-IICA scored); Phase 2b: Document the Unique Community-Specific Methods Used within the 10 Steps of the IPM to Tailor Local Intervention Delivery (using the IPM-IICA narrative); Phase 3: Measure Changes in Community Risk and Protective Factors; Phase 4: Measure the Outcomes Associated with the IPM; and Phase 5: Investigate Multiple Full Cycles Over Time.
AB - The Icelandic Prevention Model (IPM) follows a systematic but flexible process of community capacity building, data collection, analysis, dissemination, and community-engaged decision-making to guide the data-informed selection, prioritization, and implementation of intervention strategies in preventing adolescent substance use. This paper describes two new evaluation tools intended to assess the: 1) integrity of IPM implementation, and 2) unique aspects of IPM implementation in different community contexts. These evaluation tools include a: 1) five-phase IPM Evaluation Framework for Assessing Value Across Communities, Cultures, and Outcomes (IPM-EF); and 2) 10-Step IPM Implementation Integrity and Consistency Assessment (IPM-IICA) that utilizes both quantitative (scored) and qualitative (narrative) data elements to characterize implementation integrity and consistency at both community coalition and school community levels. The IPM-EF includes five phases. Phase 1: Describe the Intervention Context; Phase 2a: Document the Extent to Which the 10 Steps of the IPM were Implemented (using the IPM-IICA scored); Phase 2b: Document the Unique Community-Specific Methods Used within the 10 Steps of the IPM to Tailor Local Intervention Delivery (using the IPM-IICA narrative); Phase 3: Measure Changes in Community Risk and Protective Factors; Phase 4: Measure the Outcomes Associated with the IPM; and Phase 5: Investigate Multiple Full Cycles Over Time.
KW - Assessment
KW - Evaluation Framework
KW - Implementation
KW - Prevention
KW - Substance Use
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196034588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102451
DO - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102451
M3 - Article
C2 - 38879919
SN - 0149-7189
VL - 106
JO - Evaluation and Program Planning
JF - Evaluation and Program Planning
M1 - 102451
ER -