The Introductory Psychology Census: A National Study

Aaron S. Richmond, Guy A. Boysen, Danae L. Hudson, Regan A.R. Gurung, Karen Z. Naufel, Garth Neufeld, R. Eric Landrum, Dana S. Dunn, Melissa Beers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Nearly all undergraduate psychology programs in the United States (99%) offer an Introductory Psychology (IP) course (Norcross et al., 2016). Yet, there is a surprising dearth of information relating to the learning outcomes and course designs employed in IP, nor is information readily available regarding the training and support of those who teach it. Over the past 12 years, American Psychological Association (APA) working groups have made recommendations intended to strengthen IP but no empirical data are available concerning the efficacy or impact of those recommendations. This national census of IP instructors, conducted by APA’s Introductory Psychology Initiative (IPI), surveyed instructors of the course nationally to investigate how past IP recommendations have been implemented and to develop a baseline understanding of the current state and structure of the IP course. The census was structured in four parts, paralleling the four subgroups of the IPI: Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment; Course Models and Design; Teacher Training and Development; and Student Success and Transformation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-180
Number of pages18
JournalScholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Design
  • Introductory psychology
  • Training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Introductory Psychology Census: A National Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this