THE PURCHASING-LOGISTICS INTERFACE: A “SCOPE OF RESPONSIBILITY” TAXONOMY

Bryan Ashenbaum, Regis Terpend

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

To date, integration research has paid little attention to defining and exploring the interface between purchasing and logistics. This research seeks to catalog the set of joint activities that define this interface, and to analyze the way in which this interface is structured, in terms of how companies assign collective responsibility across the activity set. A cluster analysis of a set of 15 boundary-spanning activities reveals a preliminary taxonomy of three purchasing-logistics interface structures: (a) Purchasing-Dominant; (b) Segregated; and (c) Logistics-Dominant. The analysis also reveals limited evidence that the choice of purchasing-logistic interface structure has an influence on supply base performance. In addition, the choice of purchasing-logistics interface structure appears to be influenced by firm size.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-194
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Business Logistics
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2010

Keywords

  • Cluster analysis
  • Integration
  • Interface
  • Logistics
  • Purchasing
  • Supply chain

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'THE PURCHASING-LOGISTICS INTERFACE: A “SCOPE OF RESPONSIBILITY” TAXONOMY'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this