TY - JOUR
T1 - The relative influence of geographic and environmental factors on rare plant translocation outcomes
AU - Bellis, Joe
AU - Albrecht, Matthew A.
AU - Maschinski, Joyce
AU - Dalrymple, Sarah E.
AU - Keir, Matthew J.
AU - Chambers, Timothy
AU - Possley, Jennifer
AU - Adkins, Edith D.
AU - Parsons, Elliott W.
AU - Kunz, Michael
AU - Radcliffe, Carrie
AU - Coffey, Emily
AU - Kaye, Thomas N.
AU - Peterson, Cheryl L.
AU - David, Aaron S.
AU - Herron, Sterling A.
AU - Menges, Eric S.
AU - Bell, Timothy
AU - Coppoletta, Michelle
AU - Elam, Caitlin
AU - McEachern, Kathryn
AU - Williamson, Paula S.
AU - Boensch, Deanna
AU - Bontrager, Megan
AU - Breeden, Cooper
AU - Frade, Noah
AU - Gordon, Doria R.
AU - Link, Steven O.
AU - Littlefield, Tara
AU - Murray, Sheila
AU - O'Dell, Ryan
AU - Pavlovic, Noel B.
AU - Reemts, Charlotte M.
AU - Taylor, David D.
AU - Titus, Jonathan H.
AU - Titus, Priscilla J.
AU - Stanley, Tina A.
AU - Heineman, Katherine D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Conservation translocations are an established method for reducing the extinction risk of plant species through intentional movement within or outside the indigenous range. Unsuitable environmental conditions at translocation recipient sites and a lack of understanding of species–environment relationships are often identified as critical barriers to translocation success. However, previous syntheses have drawn these inferences from analyses of qualitative feedback rather than quantitative environmental data. In this study, we use a data set of 235 translocations conducted in the US to understand the influences of geographic and environmental factors on three metrics of translocation success: population persistence, next-generation recruitment and next-generation maturity. We use random forest models to quantify the relative importance of geographic and environmental factors that characterize dissimilarity between source and recipient locations, the position of recipient sites relative to species' ranges and niche metrics derived from these ranges. We also compare the importance of these variables with more conventional predictors (e.g. founder population size). Our results indicate that geographic and environmental variables can be as insightful as conventional variables for predicting plant translocation outcomes. The climate suitability of recipient sites, estimated using species distribution models, was the strongest relative predictor of whether a population persisted, with populations situated in more suitable climates displaying greater persistence. Next-generation recruitment and maturity were best predicted by niche metrics; species in more biotically limiting environments, including tropical regions and soils with high relative nutrient retention, as well as species with the broadest precipitation niches, were the least likely to attain these next-generation benchmarks. Synthesis and applications. Our study is one of the first to quantify the important role of spatial and climatic factors in rare plant translocation outcomes. We provide a novel geographic and environmental perspective on outcomes in plant translocations and demonstrate opportunities to improve translocation success not only by adhering to established best practice guidelines but also by integrating spatial modelling approaches into planning and management processes.
AB - Conservation translocations are an established method for reducing the extinction risk of plant species through intentional movement within or outside the indigenous range. Unsuitable environmental conditions at translocation recipient sites and a lack of understanding of species–environment relationships are often identified as critical barriers to translocation success. However, previous syntheses have drawn these inferences from analyses of qualitative feedback rather than quantitative environmental data. In this study, we use a data set of 235 translocations conducted in the US to understand the influences of geographic and environmental factors on three metrics of translocation success: population persistence, next-generation recruitment and next-generation maturity. We use random forest models to quantify the relative importance of geographic and environmental factors that characterize dissimilarity between source and recipient locations, the position of recipient sites relative to species' ranges and niche metrics derived from these ranges. We also compare the importance of these variables with more conventional predictors (e.g. founder population size). Our results indicate that geographic and environmental variables can be as insightful as conventional variables for predicting plant translocation outcomes. The climate suitability of recipient sites, estimated using species distribution models, was the strongest relative predictor of whether a population persisted, with populations situated in more suitable climates displaying greater persistence. Next-generation recruitment and maturity were best predicted by niche metrics; species in more biotically limiting environments, including tropical regions and soils with high relative nutrient retention, as well as species with the broadest precipitation niches, were the least likely to attain these next-generation benchmarks. Synthesis and applications. Our study is one of the first to quantify the important role of spatial and climatic factors in rare plant translocation outcomes. We provide a novel geographic and environmental perspective on outcomes in plant translocations and demonstrate opportunities to improve translocation success not only by adhering to established best practice guidelines but also by integrating spatial modelling approaches into planning and management processes.
KW - climate suitability
KW - conservation translocation
KW - endangered species
KW - population restoration
KW - reintroduction
KW - species distribution model
KW - threatened species
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215698942
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.14855
DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.14855
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85215698942
SN - 0021-8901
VL - 62
SP - 638
EP - 650
JO - Journal of Applied Ecology
JF - Journal of Applied Ecology
IS - 3
ER -