TY - JOUR
T1 - The Relevance of Pedigrees in the Conservation Genomics Era
AU - Galla, Stephanie J.
AU - Brown, Liz
AU - Couch-Lewis, Yvette
AU - Cubrinovska, Ilina
AU - Eason, Daryl
AU - Gooley, Rebecca M.
N1 - Galla, Stephanie J.; Brown, Liz; Couch-Lewis, Yvette; Cubrinovska, Ilina; Eason, Daryl; Gooley, Rebecca M.; . . . and Steeves, Tammy E. (2022). "The Relevance of Pedigrees in the Conservation Genomics Era". Molecular Ecology, 31(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16192
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Over the past 50 years conservation genetics has developed a substantive toolbox to inform species management. One of the most long-standing tools available to manage genetics—the pedigree—has been widely used to characterize diversity and maximize evolutionary potential in threatened populations. Now, with the ability to use high throughput sequencing to estimate relatedness, inbreeding, and genome-wide functional diversity, some have asked whether it is warranted for conservation biologists to continue collecting and collating pedigrees for species management. In this perspective, we argue that pedigrees remain a relevant tool, and when combined with genomic data, create an invaluable resource for conservation genomic management. Genomic data can address pedigree pitfalls (e.g., founder relatedness, missing data, uncertainty), and in return robust pedigrees allow for more nuanced research design, including well-informed sampling strategies and quantitative analyses (e.g., heritability, linkage) to better inform genomic inquiry. We further contend that building and maintaining pedigrees provides an opportunity to strengthen trusted relationships among conservation researchers, practitioners, Indigenous Peoples, and Local Communities.
AB - Over the past 50 years conservation genetics has developed a substantive toolbox to inform species management. One of the most long-standing tools available to manage genetics—the pedigree—has been widely used to characterize diversity and maximize evolutionary potential in threatened populations. Now, with the ability to use high throughput sequencing to estimate relatedness, inbreeding, and genome-wide functional diversity, some have asked whether it is warranted for conservation biologists to continue collecting and collating pedigrees for species management. In this perspective, we argue that pedigrees remain a relevant tool, and when combined with genomic data, create an invaluable resource for conservation genomic management. Genomic data can address pedigree pitfalls (e.g., founder relatedness, missing data, uncertainty), and in return robust pedigrees allow for more nuanced research design, including well-informed sampling strategies and quantitative analyses (e.g., heritability, linkage) to better inform genomic inquiry. We further contend that building and maintaining pedigrees provides an opportunity to strengthen trusted relationships among conservation researchers, practitioners, Indigenous Peoples, and Local Communities.
KW - conservation genomics
KW - ex situ
KW - in situ
KW - kinship
KW - pedigree
KW - quantitative genetics
UR - https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/bio_facpubs/731
U2 - 10.1111/mec.16192
DO - 10.1111/mec.16192
M3 - Article
C2 - 34553796
VL - 31
JO - Molecular Ecology
JF - Molecular Ecology
IS - 1
ER -