Abstract
The LIBOR manipulation scandal of 2008 spurred extensive policy debates regarding the importance of market-based reference rates. The alternative reference rates committee (ARRC) eventually identified the secured overnight financing rate (SOFR) to be a suitable replacement to LIBOR. In this study, we question the underlying process behind the choice of SOFR as a replacement for LIBOR. Both academic literature and regulatory bodies fail to identify a consistent definition and criteria of a good reference rate. We fill in this gap in the literature by providing an empirically testable ‘checklist’ to evaluate any potential money market rate to gauge its suitability as a reference rate. We also carry out an empirical evaluation of various money market rates against our criteria and identify the 1-month AA non-financial commercial paper rate as the best available replacement for LIBOR.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 939-976 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2022 |
Keywords
- Benchmark rate
- Calendar regularities
- LIBOR replacement
- Reference rate
- SOFR