TY - JOUR
T1 - The state of rural public health
T2 - Enduring needs in a new decade
AU - Leider, Jonathon P.
AU - Meit, Michael
AU - Mac McCullough, J.
AU - Resnick, Beth
AU - Dekker, Debra
AU - Natalia Alfonso, Y.
AU - Bishai, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Public Health Association Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Public health in the rural United States is a complex and underfunded enterprise. While urban- rural disparities have been a focus for researchers and policymakers alike for decades, inequalities continue to grow. Life expectancy at birth is now 1 to 2 years greater between wealthier urban and rural counties, and is as much as 5 years, on average, between wealthy and poor counties. This article explores the growth in these disparities over the past 40 years, with roots in structural, economic, and social spending differentials that have emerged or persisted over the same time period. Importantly, a focus on place-based disparities recognizes that the rural United States is not a monolith, with important geographic and cultural differences present regionally.We also focus on the challenges the rural governmental public health enterprise faces, the so-called "double disparity" ofworse health outcomes and behaviors alongside modest investment in health departments comparedwith their nonrural peers. Finally, we offer 5 populationbased "prescriptions" for supporting rural public health in the United States. These relate to greater investment and supporting rural advocacy to better address the needs of the rural United States in this new decade.
AB - Public health in the rural United States is a complex and underfunded enterprise. While urban- rural disparities have been a focus for researchers and policymakers alike for decades, inequalities continue to grow. Life expectancy at birth is now 1 to 2 years greater between wealthier urban and rural counties, and is as much as 5 years, on average, between wealthy and poor counties. This article explores the growth in these disparities over the past 40 years, with roots in structural, economic, and social spending differentials that have emerged or persisted over the same time period. Importantly, a focus on place-based disparities recognizes that the rural United States is not a monolith, with important geographic and cultural differences present regionally.We also focus on the challenges the rural governmental public health enterprise faces, the so-called "double disparity" ofworse health outcomes and behaviors alongside modest investment in health departments comparedwith their nonrural peers. Finally, we offer 5 populationbased "prescriptions" for supporting rural public health in the United States. These relate to greater investment and supporting rural advocacy to better address the needs of the rural United States in this new decade.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089433296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305728
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305728
M3 - Article
C2 - 32673103
AN - SCOPUS:85089433296
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 110
SP - 1283
EP - 1290
JO - American Journal of Public Health
JF - American Journal of Public Health
IS - 9
ER -