Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The TESS Mission Target Selection Procedure

  • Michael Fausnaugh
  • , Ed Morgan
  • , Roland Vanderspek
  • , Joshua Pepper
  • , Christopher J. Burke
  • , Alan M. Levine
  • , Alexander Rudat
  • , Jesus Noel S. Villasenor
  • , Michael Vezie
  • , Robert F. Goeke
  • , George R. Ricker
  • , David W. Latham
  • , S. Seager
  • , Joshua N. Winn
  • , Jon M. Jenkins
  • , G. A. Bakos
  • , Thomas Barclay
  • , Zachory K. Berta-Thompson
  • , Luke G. Bouma
  • , Patricia T. Boyd
  • C. E. Brasseur, Jennifer Burt, Douglas A. Caldwell, David Charbonneau, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, Mark Clampin, Karen A. Collins, Knicole D. Colon, Nathan De Lee, Edward Dunham, Scott W. Fleming, William Fong, Aylin Garcia Soto, B. Scott Gaudi, Natalia M. Guerrero, Katharine Hesse, Matthew J. Holman, Chelsea X. Huang, Lisa Kaltenegger, Jack J. Lissauer, Scott McDermott, Brian McLean, Ismael Mireles, Susan E. Mullally, Ryan J. Oelkers, Martin Paegert, Andras Pal, Elisa Quintana, S. A. Rinehart, David R. Rodriguez, Mark Rose, Dimitar D. Sasselov, Joshua E. Schlieder, Lizhou Sha, Avi Shporer, Jeffrey C. Smith, Keivan G. Stassun, Peter Tenenbaum, Eric B. Ting, Guillermo Torres, Joseph D. Twicken, Andrew Vanderburg, Bill Wohler, Liang Yu
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
  • Lehigh University
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Princeton University
  • NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
  • Institute for Advanced Study - USA
  • University of Maryland Medical System
  • Colorado State University System
  • Space Telescope Science Institute
  • California Institute of Technology
  • SETI Institute
  • Aarhus University
  • Northern Kentucky University
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Dartmouth College
  • University System of Ohio
  • Cornell University
  • University of New Mexico
  • HUN-REN HQ
  • University of Wisconsin System
  • Fisk University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

We describe the target selection procedure by which stars are selected for 2 minute and 20 s observations by TESS. We first list the technical requirements of the TESS instrument and ground systems processing that limit the total number of target slots. We then describe algorithms used by the TESS Payload Operation Center (POC) to merge candidate targets requested by the various TESS mission elements (the Target Selection Working Group, TESS Asteroseismic Science Consortium, and Guest Investigator office). Lastly, we summarize the properties of the observed TESS targets over the two-year primary TESS mission. We find that the POC target selection algorithm results in 2.1-3.4 times as many observed targets as target slots allocated for each mission element. We also find that the sky distribution of observed targets is different from the sky distributions of candidate targets due to technical constraints that require a relatively even distribution of targets across the TESS fields of view. We caution researchers exploring statistical analyses of TESS planet-host stars that the population of observed targets cannot be characterized by any simple set of criteria applied to the properties of the input Candidate Target Lists.
Original languageEnglish
Article number095002
Number of pages15
JournalPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Volume133
Issue number1027
Early online date8 Sep 2021
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Stars
  • 1st
  • Asteroseismology
  • Light

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The TESS Mission Target Selection Procedure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this