To Detain or Not to Detain? Using Propensity Scores to Examine the Relationship Between Pretrial Detention and Conviction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent work has found that individuals who are detained prior to their sentencing are more likely to be convicted, be sentenced to prison as opposed to jail or probation, and to receive longer sentences if convicted. Is this effect due to detention, or is it merely a result of the same underlying criminal propensity being considered separately at each stage of the sentencing process? This study uses propensity score methods to create more comparable comparisons between detained and released criminal defendants. The results of this study indicate that detention itself has an independent effect on the likelihood of conviction. Even after matching with available covariates, individuals who are detained are more likely to be convicted than those who are released prior to their trial.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)128-152
Number of pages25
JournalCriminal Justice Policy Review
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • criminal court
  • criminal justice policy
  • sentencing
  • sentencing disparity

EGS Disciplines

  • Criminology and Criminal Justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To Detain or Not to Detain? Using Propensity Scores to Examine the Relationship Between Pretrial Detention and Conviction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this