Transaction-Level Learning Analytics in Online Authentic Assessments

Rob Nyland, Randall S. Davies, John Chapman, Gove Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper presents a case for the use of transaction-level data when analyzing automated online assessment results to identify knowledge gaps and misconceptions for individual students. Transaction-level data, which records all of the steps a student uses to complete an assessment item, are preferred over traditional assessment formats that submit only the final answer, as the system can detect persistent misconceptions. In this study we collected transaction-level data from 996 students enrolled in an online introductory spreadsheet class. Each student’s final answer and step-by-step attempts were coded for misconceptions or knowledge gaps regarding the use of absolute references over four assessment occasions. Overall, the level of error revealed was significantly higher in the step-by-step processes compared to the final submitted answers. Further analysis suggests that students most often have misconceptions regarding non-critical errors. Data analysis also suggests that misconceptions identified at the transaction level persist over time.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Computing in Higher Education
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • assessment
  • data logs
  • educational data mining
  • learning analytics

EGS Disciplines

  • Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
  • Online and Distance Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transaction-Level Learning Analytics in Online Authentic Assessments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this