Treatment outcome differences between youth offenders from a rural joint commission accredited residential treatment center and a rural non-accredited center

Kenneth M. Coll; Margaret Sass; Brenda J. Freeman; P. Thobro; Nicole Hauser

doi:10.1080/0886571X.2013.819274

Treatment outcome differences between youth offenders from a rural joint commission accredited residential treatment center and a rural non-accredited center

Kenneth M. Coll
, Margaret Sass
, Brenda J. Freeman
, P. Thobro
, Nicole Hauser

College of Arts and Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study was undertaken to investigate the treatment outcome differences between youth offenders from the joint commission accredited residential treatment center (RTC) and youth from a non-accredited center. Results showed that youth from the accredited center reported significantly more progress.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	227-237
Number of pages	11
Journal	Residential Treatment for Children and Youth
Volume	30
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2013.819274
State	Published - 1 Jul 2013

Keywords

non-accredited center
residential treatment center
treatment outcome
YCRA
youth offenders

Access to Document

10.1080/0886571X.2013.819274

Cite this

@article{b51ceff674e048c28b289f12194343e6,

title = "Treatment outcome differences between youth offenders from a rural joint commission accredited residential treatment center and a rural non-accredited center",

abstract = "This study was undertaken to investigate the treatment outcome differences between youth offenders from the joint commission accredited residential treatment center (RTC) and youth from a non-accredited center. Results showed that youth from the accredited center reported significantly more progress.",

keywords = "non-accredited center, residential treatment center, treatment outcome, YCRA, youth offenders",

author = "Coll, \{Kenneth M.\} and Margaret Sass and Freeman, \{Brenda J.\} and P. Thobro and Nicole Hauser",

year = "2013",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1080/0886571X.2013.819274",

language = "English",

volume = "30",

pages = "227--237",

number = "3",

}

Treatment outcome differences between youth offenders from a rural joint commission accredited residential treatment center and a rural non-accredited center. / Coll, Kenneth M.; Sass, Margaret; Freeman, Brenda J. et al.
In: Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.07.2013, p. 227-237.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment outcome differences between youth offenders from a rural joint commission accredited residential treatment center and a rural non-accredited center

AU - Coll, Kenneth M.

AU - Sass, Margaret

AU - Freeman, Brenda J.

AU - Thobro, P.

AU - Hauser, Nicole

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - This study was undertaken to investigate the treatment outcome differences between youth offenders from the joint commission accredited residential treatment center (RTC) and youth from a non-accredited center. Results showed that youth from the accredited center reported significantly more progress.

AB - This study was undertaken to investigate the treatment outcome differences between youth offenders from the joint commission accredited residential treatment center (RTC) and youth from a non-accredited center. Results showed that youth from the accredited center reported significantly more progress.

KW - non-accredited center

KW - residential treatment center

KW - treatment outcome

KW - YCRA

KW - youth offenders

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84882310327

U2 - 10.1080/0886571X.2013.819274

DO - 10.1080/0886571X.2013.819274

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84882310327

SN - 0886-571X

VL - 30

SP - 227

EP - 237

JO - Residential Treatment for Children and Youth

JF - Residential Treatment for Children and Youth

IS - 3

ER -

Treatment outcome differences between youth offenders from a rural joint commission accredited residential treatment center and a rural non-accredited center

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this