TY - JOUR
T1 - Trypan Blue Image-Guided Removal of Surface-Based Bacterial Biofilms from Chicken Tissue Using Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma
AU - Okebiorun, Michael
AU - Miller, Dalton
AU - Cornell, Kenneth A.
AU - Browning, Jim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - The study evaluates the efficacy of an image-guided CAP treatment method with a plasma device capable of rapid biofilm removal from chicken tissue. The plasma treatment operating configuration includes a gas mixture of Argon and H2O at a flowrate of 1.5 lpm. An X-Y stage was used to move the chicken sample below the stationary plasma scalpel at a speed of 0.1 mm/s. The discharge voltage and current were maintained between 3.2 and 3.7 kV (AC 20 kHz), and at 3 mA, respectively. The electrode gap and sample distance were set to 0.6 mm and 4 mm. This configuration facilitated effective biofilm removal, as confirmed by CFU analysis and 3D microscopic analysis showing a >99% reduction in biofilm post treatment with an etch rate of 2.2–5.8 µm/s and an impact width of up to 300 µm. The plasma scalpel electrode temperature reached 94.7 °C, while the targeted biofilm area was heated to 36.3 °C, suggesting non-thermal biofilm disruption. Three-dimensional microscopic analysis revealed biofilm thickness on chicken tissues ranging from 20 to 180 µm, comparable to biofilm loads on mammalian tissues. In conclusion, the study highlights the potential of CAP devices as a promising solution for biofilm debridement.
AB - The study evaluates the efficacy of an image-guided CAP treatment method with a plasma device capable of rapid biofilm removal from chicken tissue. The plasma treatment operating configuration includes a gas mixture of Argon and H2O at a flowrate of 1.5 lpm. An X-Y stage was used to move the chicken sample below the stationary plasma scalpel at a speed of 0.1 mm/s. The discharge voltage and current were maintained between 3.2 and 3.7 kV (AC 20 kHz), and at 3 mA, respectively. The electrode gap and sample distance were set to 0.6 mm and 4 mm. This configuration facilitated effective biofilm removal, as confirmed by CFU analysis and 3D microscopic analysis showing a >99% reduction in biofilm post treatment with an etch rate of 2.2–5.8 µm/s and an impact width of up to 300 µm. The plasma scalpel electrode temperature reached 94.7 °C, while the targeted biofilm area was heated to 36.3 °C, suggesting non-thermal biofilm disruption. Three-dimensional microscopic analysis revealed biofilm thickness on chicken tissues ranging from 20 to 180 µm, comparable to biofilm loads on mammalian tissues. In conclusion, the study highlights the potential of CAP devices as a promising solution for biofilm debridement.
KW - atmospheric pressure plasma
KW - bacterial biofilm
KW - debridement
KW - image-guided treatment
KW - wound
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017035128
U2 - 10.3390/plasma8030034
DO - 10.3390/plasma8030034
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105017035128
VL - 8
JO - Plasma
JF - Plasma
IS - 3
M1 - 34
ER -