U-Th-Pb Dating of Monazite by Single-Collector ICP-MS: Pitfalls and Potential

Matthew J. Kohn, Jeffery D. Vervoort

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Methods are presented for in situ determination of Pb/U, Pb/Th, and Pb/Pb ages in monazite by laser ablation, single-collector, magnetic sector inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Analytical precisions for individual spot analyses are ±2–3% for 206 Pb/ 238 U and 207 Pb/ 235 U, 4% for 208 Pb/ 232 Th, and 1–2% for 207 Pb/ 206 Pb (2σ, SD). For pooled analyses these precisions are ∼ ± 1–2% for 206 Pb/ 238 U, 207 Pb/ 235 U, and 208 Pb/ 232 Th and ≤1% for 207 Pb/ 206 Pb (2σ, SE). When normalized to Trebilcock, LA-ICP-MS ages on other monazite standards can deviate from their thermal ionization mass spectrometry (ID-TIMS) ages by up to 1% for 207 Pb/ 206 Pb and up to 5% for 206 Pb/ 238 U, 207 Pb/ 235 U, and 208 Pb/ 232 Th ages. This variability has also been observed for secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) Th-Pb dating. The source(s) of these inaccuracies remains unknown. Although there are significant uncertainties inherent in this technique, U-Th-Pb monazite dating by LA-ICP-MS has important applications where this higher level of uncertainty is acceptable. Application to a large vein monazite from the Llallagua tin district of Bolivia suggests mineralization at 17–21 Ma, consistent with 21 Ma K-Ar ages from wallrock minerals but distinct from ∼45 Ma ages from apatite (Sm/Nd) and zircon (Pb/Pb).

Original languageAmerican English
JournalGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
StatePublished - 23 Apr 2008

EGS Disciplines

  • Earth Sciences
  • Geophysics and Seismology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'U-Th-Pb Dating of Monazite by Single-Collector ICP-MS: Pitfalls and Potential'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this