U-Th-Pb dating of monazite by single-collector ICP-MS: Pitfalls and potential

Matthew J. Kohn, Jeffery D. Vervoort

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

73 Scopus citations

Abstract

Methods are presented for in situ determination of Pb/U, Pb/Th, and Pb/Pb ages in monazite by laser ablation, single-collector, magnetic sector inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Analytical precisions for individual spot analyses are ±2-3% for 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U, 4% for 208Pb/232Th, and 1-2% for 207Pb/206Pb (2σ, SD). For pooled analyses these precisions are ∼ ± 1-2% for 206Pb/ 238U, 207Pb/235U, and 208Pb/ 232Th and ≤1% for 207Pb/206Pb (2σ, SE). When normalized to Trebilcock, LA-ICP-MS ages on other monazite standards can deviate from their thermal ionization mass spectrometry (ID-TIMS) ages by up to 1% for 207Pb/206Pb and up to 5% for 206Pb/238U, 207Pb/U, and 208Pb/ 232Th ages. This variability has also been observed for secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) Th-Pb dating. The source(s) of these inaccuracies remains unknown. Although there are significant uncertainties inherent in this technique, U-Th-Pb monazite dating by LA-ICP-MS has important applications where this higher level of uncertainty is acceptable. Application to a large vein monazite from the Llallagua tin district of Bolivia suggests mineralization at 17-21 Ma, consistent with 21 Ma K-Ar ages from wallrock minerals but distinct from ∼45 Ma ages from apatite (Sm/Nd) and zircon (Pb/Pb).

Original languageAmerican English
Article numberQ04031
JournalGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Keywords

  • ICP-MS
  • Laser ablation
  • Monazite
  • U-Th-Pb dating

EGS Disciplines

  • Earth Sciences
  • Geophysics and Seismology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'U-Th-Pb dating of monazite by single-collector ICP-MS: Pitfalls and potential'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this