Abstract
This study examined the validity of one state's alternate assessment portfolio system using the American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education's Standards for Psychological and Educational Testing. The results indicate serious shortcomings in the evidence for content, response process, and structural validity. Options for improving the validity of the assessment system are provided, and the implications of our findings are discussed in the context of standards-based reform.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 266-275 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Remedial and Special Education |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Validating an alternate assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver