TY - JOUR
T1 - Variation in Stakeholder Preferences for Implementing Evidence-Based Practices in Behavioral Health Care
AU - Candon, Molly
AU - Williams, Nathaniel
AU - Zentgraf, Kelly
AU - Buttenheim, Alison
AU - Bewtra, Meenakshi
AU - Beidas, Rinad S.
AU - Stewart, Rebecca E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Objective: The authors examined whether stakeholders in behavioral health care differ in their preferences for strategies that support the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Methods: Using data collected in March and April 2019 in a survey of stakeholders in Philadelphia Medicaid’s behavioral health care system, the authors compared empirical Bayes preference weights for implementation strategies across clinicians, supervisors, agency executives, and payers. Results: Preferences for implementation strategies overlapped among the stakeholders (N5357 survey respondents). Financial incentives were consistently ranked as most useful and performance feedback as the least useful for implementing EBPs. However, areas of divergence were identified. For example, payers preferred compensation for EBP delivery, whereas clinicians considered compensation for time spent on preparing for EBPs as equally useful. Conclusions: The observed variation in stakeholder preferences for strategies to implement EBPs may shed light on why the ongoing shift from volume to value in behavioral health care has had mixed results.
AB - Objective: The authors examined whether stakeholders in behavioral health care differ in their preferences for strategies that support the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Methods: Using data collected in March and April 2019 in a survey of stakeholders in Philadelphia Medicaid’s behavioral health care system, the authors compared empirical Bayes preference weights for implementation strategies across clinicians, supervisors, agency executives, and payers. Results: Preferences for implementation strategies overlapped among the stakeholders (N5357 survey respondents). Financial incentives were consistently ranked as most useful and performance feedback as the least useful for implementing EBPs. However, areas of divergence were identified. For example, payers preferred compensation for EBP delivery, whereas clinicians considered compensation for time spent on preparing for EBPs as equally useful. Conclusions: The observed variation in stakeholder preferences for strategies to implement EBPs may shed light on why the ongoing shift from volume to value in behavioral health care has had mixed results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134401418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.202100453
DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.202100453
M3 - Article
C2 - 35319915
AN - SCOPUS:85134401418
SN - 1075-2730
VL - 73
SP - 1270
EP - 1273
JO - Psychiatric Services
JF - Psychiatric Services
IS - 11
ER -