TY - CONF
T1 - Why Do Managers Interact with Unfavorable Analysts During Earnings Calls?
AU - Flake, Jared
N1 - Presentation Date: Monday August 7, 2023 Presentation Time: 4:00 pm-5:30 pm ABSTRACT: Managers prioritize questions from favorable analysts during earnings announcement conference calls, reinforcing analysts' incentives to be optimistic. However, managers also interact with unfavorable analysts on calls, and, when they do, absolute announcement returns are larger.
PY - 2023/8/7
Y1 - 2023/8/7
N2 - Managers prioritize questions from favorable analysts during earnings announcement conference calls, reinforcing analysts’ incentives to be optimistic. However, managers also interact with unfavorable analysts on calls, and, when they do, absolute announcement returns are larger. I seek to understand why managers interact with unfavorable analysts. I find that unfavorable analysts attenuate their negative views after these interactions with managers. Additionally, the stock price response is stronger for forecasts from managers who regularly interact with unfavorable analysts, consistent with enhanced credibility of these managers. Finally, I use peer firm restatement announcements as exogenous shocks to investors’ assessment of a firm’s accounting quality, and I find that nonrestating firms with managers who regularly interact with unfavorable analysts experience attenuated negative returns, relative to nonrestating peers. Overall my findings are consistent with managers’ interactions.
AB - Managers prioritize questions from favorable analysts during earnings announcement conference calls, reinforcing analysts’ incentives to be optimistic. However, managers also interact with unfavorable analysts on calls, and, when they do, absolute announcement returns are larger. I seek to understand why managers interact with unfavorable analysts. I find that unfavorable analysts attenuate their negative views after these interactions with managers. Additionally, the stock price response is stronger for forecasts from managers who regularly interact with unfavorable analysts, consistent with enhanced credibility of these managers. Finally, I use peer firm restatement announcements as exogenous shocks to investors’ assessment of a firm’s accounting quality, and I find that nonrestating firms with managers who regularly interact with unfavorable analysts experience attenuated negative returns, relative to nonrestating peers. Overall my findings are consistent with managers’ interactions.
UR - https://www2.aaahq.org/AM/abstract.cfm?submissionID=23407
M3 - Presentation
T2 - 2023 Annual AAA Conference
Y2 - 7 August 2023
ER -