Abstract
The opaqueness of author naming and ordering, when coupled with power dynamics, can lead to a number of disadvantages in academic careers. In this commentary, we investigate gender differences in authorship experiences in a large prospective meta-analytic study (k = 46; n = 3,565; 12 countries). We find that women’s and men’s authorship experiences differ significantly with women reporting greater prevalence of problematic behaviors. We present seven actionable recommendations for improving the receipt and reporting of intellectual credit. Such actions are needed to ensure fairness in authorship, which is one of the most powerful factors in academics’ career outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1273-1287 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Management |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2025 |
Keywords
- Diversity; equity; and inclusion
- METHODS; Diversity; equity; and inclusion
- METHODS; Open science (e.g.; transparency in research practices)
- MICRO
- MICRO; Identity (age; disability; gender; national origin; race-ethnicity; sexual orientation; etc.)
- Meta-Analysis
- Quantitative
- Quantitative