Abstract
In this article the authors examine the Supreme Court's recent decision in Arizona v. Gant and argue that the high court correctly clarified the law regarding what police may do when conducting a search incident to the arrest of someone in a vehicle. In the following article, friend and colleague Martin O'Connor argues the Supreme Court (and this article) are wrong and that the decision will negatively impact police investigation of criminal activity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 197-207 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Criminal Justice Studies |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Police
- Search incident exception
- Supreme Court
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Writing a manual for police officers: The supreme court revisits the vehicle search incident to arrest rule in Arizona v. Gant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver