TY - JOUR
T1 - “You Have to Have the Right People … ”
T2 - Considerations for Men Probation Officers with Gender-Responsive Caseloads
AU - Belisle, Linsey A.
AU - Salisbury, Emily J.
AU - Foster, Megan
AU - Cowell Mercier, Mariah
AU - Seawright, Jessia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Gender-responsive supervision tailors the evidence-based principles of effective intervention to women by emphasizing their gendered experiences, strengths, and needs. Because of this, a common question when working with agencies to implement gender-responsive practices is: Can men work with justice-involved women utilizing a gender-responsive approach? This question brings up some critical and under-researched considerations surrounding the gendered dynamics of probation officers (POs) who engage in gender-responsive practices. The current study is the first to explore the gendered implications of men POs engaging in gender-responsive supervision with an all-women caseload. Interviews with staff and clients at a gender-responsive probation unit in a Western state provide first-hand accounts of client and staff perceptions and experiences surrounding men POs engaging in gender-responsive probation. Themes indicated that men POs positively impacted women on their caseload when they utilized gender-responsive and trauma-informed approaches–suggesting that it is more about one’s skills and capabilities to engage in gender-responsive practices than their gender. Nevertheless, interviews highlighted gender-specific nuances among POs, revealing strengths and challenges associated with gendered experiences of holding a gender-responsive caseload. This study addresses practical implications, acknowledges limitations, and recommends future research directions to explore this understudied area and advance the literature on gender-responsive practices.
AB - Gender-responsive supervision tailors the evidence-based principles of effective intervention to women by emphasizing their gendered experiences, strengths, and needs. Because of this, a common question when working with agencies to implement gender-responsive practices is: Can men work with justice-involved women utilizing a gender-responsive approach? This question brings up some critical and under-researched considerations surrounding the gendered dynamics of probation officers (POs) who engage in gender-responsive practices. The current study is the first to explore the gendered implications of men POs engaging in gender-responsive supervision with an all-women caseload. Interviews with staff and clients at a gender-responsive probation unit in a Western state provide first-hand accounts of client and staff perceptions and experiences surrounding men POs engaging in gender-responsive probation. Themes indicated that men POs positively impacted women on their caseload when they utilized gender-responsive and trauma-informed approaches–suggesting that it is more about one’s skills and capabilities to engage in gender-responsive practices than their gender. Nevertheless, interviews highlighted gender-specific nuances among POs, revealing strengths and challenges associated with gendered experiences of holding a gender-responsive caseload. This study addresses practical implications, acknowledges limitations, and recommends future research directions to explore this understudied area and advance the literature on gender-responsive practices.
KW - community-supervision
KW - gender
KW - Gender-responsive
KW - probation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216570893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23774657.2025.2454022
DO - 10.1080/23774657.2025.2454022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216570893
SN - 2377-4657
JO - Corrections: Policy, Practice, and Research
JF - Corrections: Policy, Practice, and Research
ER -